Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
what you are basically telling me is that i suck as a player since you think viking/constanza would be more help. if that's true, then why am i even playing?
That's not what I'm saying at all. I wasn't basing anything on who is the most helpful. I've just seen the game go down this road before. If all three of you are innocent and we vote Viking or Constanza. We then risk spending another round focused on you and possible voting you off. That's two rounds with 4 townies dead and not a single mafia.
Plus, it's going to make things more divisive. I'm already being called mafia for switching my vote off of you. I just feel keeping you alive will just lead us further down the wrong path.
no but my point is that you have continued to tirade against me, with no real theories (except ones that don't really apply to me) and then say sketchy stuff.
What more do you want. It is the first round. Someone with good theories is either Mafia or Inspector. I am neither. It's not like you have some well formulated theory against VV other than that he isn't you.
I honestly feel like it's kind of fishy that even though SFA had posted several times in between Phi stating that no matter what the round would end at nine, but then waited until right before it closed to change his vote. It really looks like you're trying to save viking. Several players aren't even around to see that you did that and be aware that the tally had shifted before the round ended.
What more do you want. It is the first round. Someone with good theories is either Mafia or Inspector. I am neither. It's not like you have some well formulated theory against VV other than that he isn't you.
so you're just going after me to be rude? or did you draw one of the three names out of a hat on who you were going to pick on as much?
you've been supporting viking and all his theories, but suddenly someone with good theories is mafia or inspector? that makes sense.....
I honestly feel like it's kind of fishy that even though SFA had posted several times in between Phi stating that no matter what the round would end at nine, but then waited until right before it closed to change his vote. It really looks like you're trying to save viking. Several players aren't even around to see that you did that and be aware that the tally had shifted before the round ended.
Dang. I can't win. People think I'm shady no matter what I do. If I had vested interest in saving Viking I wouldn't have changed my vote off of EAP to begin with. In fact, keeping my vote on her would have been the smart move for a mafia member.
I honestly feel like it's kind of fishy that even though SFA had posted several times in between Phi stating that no matter what the round would end at nine, but then waited until right before it closed to change his vote. It really looks like you're trying to save viking. Several players aren't even around to see that you did that and be aware that the tally had shifted before the round ended.
Dang. I can't win. People think I'm shady no matter what I do. If I had vested interest in saving Viking I wouldn't have changed my vote off of EAP to begin with. In fact, keeping my vote on her would have been the smart move for a mafia member.
Distancing yourself from a mafia member by voting for them is pretty commonplace. It was only when you absolutely HAD to that you switched the vote.
Also, I came in from work. Got caught up on the tread and then mowed the lawn before it got dark. I made my decision while mowing. It never crossed my mind that voting was about to close.
So theres no chance of you reconsidering that vote change? I think it's the wrong move. RDK made a lot of noise but honestly he did not convince me of anything.
Dang. I can't win. People think I'm shady no matter what I do. If I had vested interest in saving Viking I wouldn't have changed my vote off of EAP to begin with. In fact, keeping my vote on her would have been the smart move for a mafia member.
Distancing yourself from a mafia member by voting for them is pretty commonplace. It was only when you absolutely HAD to that you switched the vote.
I for one think that this vote change proves that SFA and EAP are not both mafia. One or the other may be, but the only situation where both would be mafia is if Sarah is mafia too.
Distancing yourself from a mafia member by voting for them is pretty commonplace. It was only when you absolutely HAD to that you switched the vote.
I for one think that this vote change proves that SFA and EAP are not both mafia. One or the other may be, but the only situation where both would be mafia is if Sarah is mafia too.
In that scenario I was saying that viking and SFA were mafia. SFA voted for viking, and held that vote until 20 minutes before voting ended, and then switched off of him only when it was pretty much certain no one else was changing their vote.
Dang. I can't win. People think I'm shady no matter what I do. If I had vested interest in saving Viking I wouldn't have changed my vote off of EAP to begin with. In fact, keeping my vote on her would have been the smart move for a mafia member.
Distancing yourself from a mafia member by voting for them is pretty commonplace. It was only when you absolutely HAD to that you switched the vote.
Well I mistyped, I realized after (and posted) that you voted for me. So I kind of agree that both you and EAP aren't mafia. But it still stands that you switching your vote last minute like that could look like you saving viking.
Wow, I didn't expect to be alive when I came back. First, Phi, your count is wrong. It should be 1, 5, 5 after SFA Switched. If anyone has any questions for me, I would be glad to answer. EAP, you have ignored every one of my posts, and instead focus only on Bacon and RDK. I cannot control what they do or say, but I want to know why you are ignoring my posts and what I have asked.
Well I mistyped, I realized after (and posted) that you voted for me. So I kind of agree that both you and EAP aren't mafia. But it still stands that you switching your vote last minute like that could look like you saving viking.
Also agree that they are probably not both mafia this time.
Well I mistyped, I realized after (and posted) that you voted for me. So I kind of agree that both you and EAP aren't mafia. But it still stands that you switching your vote last minute like that could look like you saving viking.
So again. I wouldn't have taken my vote off of EAP if I were in cahoots with Viking. That only helped put him in hot water. I wouldn't have made any of the moves I've made if I were mafia. I voted off the other two mafia members last time I was mafia. I wouldn't stick my neck out like that to save a member. That's not how I play.
By the way I fully expect to be killed tonight. Either because I am right and the mafia and scared of me or because I am wrong and the mafia use it to frame the various people I've mentioned. That's another part of my strategy. As a polarizing player I am distracting mafia focus from the inspector.
Well SFA I'm not necessarily insisting you are mafia I'm just throwing ideas around now but it did still kind of at first look like you were trying to save viking. I still think that viking is more suspicious than EAP and don't think it was the right thing to switch.
So theres no chance of you reconsidering that vote change? I think it's the wrong move. RDK made a lot of noise but honestly he did not convince me of anything.
I'm not convinced of anything. I think it's more likely that EAP and Viking are both innocent. My vote was based on the future of the game. I think keeping EAP alive at this point is more harmful because it's going to focus the discussion on her for another round etc.....