Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Its definitely real. I think Radar is pretty reputable. Wikipedia "gay gene" for some interesting info on the subject. On the one hand its positive that scientists can pinpoint the biology behind different sexualities because it proves that it is beyond anyone's control and takes away the long-held argument that it is a "lifestyle choice". But it is scary to think that people could abort gay fetuses, or change their sexuality. Or even if they did nothing, obviously there would be a change in parenting because the child's parents will expect them to "act gay"... and what if they decide they aren't? Crazy.
Because finding a "cure" for gayness is more important than curing AIDS or cancer. How about a patch to stop Downs Syndrome, or numerous other genetic conditions that are actual AILMENTS!!!!!
Because finding a "cure" for gayness is more important than curing AIDS or cancer. How about a patch to stop Downs Syndrome, or numerous other genetic conditions that are actual AILMENTS!!!!!
very true! if you could "cure" gay with stem cell research 'they" would be all for it.
Last Edit: Mar 16, 2007 10:02:22 GMT -5 by Dude - Back to Top
also i think we are to a point with genetic science that we should ban all types of genetic manipulation for animals or plants. its just not safe. its like giving a loaded gun to a group of 5 year olds that have never seen a gun before. and certainly human modification is a horrible horiible thing to be doing. cant they see how crazy that is? if your that terrified of gay people you dont have the mental requirements to be a parent. so go get neutered. maybe a patch to sterilize morons would be better.
Last Edit: Mar 16, 2007 10:05:41 GMT -5 by Dude - Back to Top
i'm not sure why any pregnant woman who had the baby's best interest at heart would have an amniocentesis just to find out if their kid was going to be gay. I had to have it done with both my kids because of genetic issues with my family history and its not an easy procedure, incredibly uncomfortable and not without risks.
"White collar conservative flashin down the street, pointing that plastic finger at me, they all assume my kind will drop and die, but I'm gonna wave my freak flag high." Jimi Hendrix
i'm not sure why any pregnant woman who had the baby's best interest at heart would have an amniocentesis just to find out if their kid was going to be gay. I had to have it done with both my kids because of genetic issues with my family history and its not an easy procedure, incredibly uncomfortable and not without risks.
I'll have to have them done too for the same reason. But my future is a parent is just that... far into the future. It will be nice to know the sex of the baby for sure and well in advance.
Couldn't this potentially work the other way around too. I mean, if a gay couple were having a baby and chose to insure it's sexual preference, would you guys have a problem with that? I bring this up because I read a story awhile back about deaf couples genetically insuring their kids would be deaf as well so they could better communicate with them...
i think any type of genetic manipulation is wrong. and unsafe. and stupid and disgusting. i could keep going. its just bad. as a parent i cant imagine anyone moding their kids. if its healthy theyre happy. no need to change what kind of person they will be because of your own stupidity. we are what we are. and thats the way it should be. we shouldnt be choosing gay/straight, def/hearing, boy/girl, blue eyes/brown eyes. is hitler running this study? im pretty sure even religious people would be totally against this kind of thing. this takes homophobia to a whole new level. and if homosexuality is determined by a gene then wouldnt it be some type of a variant of human? dont want to say sub species or anythign that could be taken negatively, im not sure what the correct scientific term would be. but if thats the case this would be genoicide/extermination. its nuts.
The problem is I'm fairly certain the funding behind proving homosexuality is genetic is primarily funded by pro-gay interests. It'll be sort of funny to watch both sides switch on this issue when genetic modification becomes a legit option. In a sick, Jerry Springer sort of way.
I don't know where I stand on this, but I can tell you guys are being naive in assuming it will be used for cure-all purposes only. There will be gay couples wanting gay babies as weird as that sounds. It's just human nature.
well i think its already going on. secretariates organs were double normal size. it wouldnt surprise me. olympians. barry bonds. the super secret military delta alpha squad. buckethead. who knows? we are running out of land how about people with gills? flying people? i think we should leave it alone. but we wont. its not in our nature. maybe they could fix that. our take away our combative nature. it used to be a survival tactic. but now its likely to kill us all.
Last Edit: Mar 19, 2007 23:22:23 GMT -5 by Dude - Back to Top
No Comment
