Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I think it's obvious that I wouldn't have known about Bek's spelling error if I hadn't received her message containing it. You guys, on the other hand, are just making up those quotes.
I know that there is definitely someone still alive who can confirm the content of that message in their Inbox, and I would much appreciate it if they did so.
Well, I'm a little confused by this. I don't know if you're wrong about her sending them out en masse, or why she would have sent mine separately, but townsperson was spelled correctly in mine.
The rules state that run-offs come in the event of a tie vote. I'm not even the Referee, so I wouldn't be conducting any further run-offs. I'm against another run-off, myself.
What I was saying was that, once Tara had 6-7 votes, the Mafia wouldn't have been able to prevent Tara's death. I said it was their best-case scenario, because at the time they could have caused a 6-6-1 tie. That would have led to another run-off, which would have kept Tara alive longer.
You said I "quote the rule-book every page," and that is definitely not quoting a rule. I'm clarifying them, but that's not a quote. I think you're grasping at straws here.
Post by rooconteur on Mar 20, 2009 14:13:37 GMT -5
Whether you quoted the rule book or not, has nothing to do with whether or not you abused a loophole in a friendly game because you don't want to lose.
I think it's obvious that I wouldn't have known about Bek's spelling error if I hadn't received her message containing it. You guys, on the other hand, are just making up those quotes.
I know that there is definitely someone still alive who can confirm the content of that message in their Inbox, and I would much appreciate it if they did so.
Well, I'm a little confused by this. I don't know if you're wrong about her sending them out en masse, or why she would have sent mine separately, but townsperson was spelled correctly in mine.
Did you receive the message earlier or later than I received it? It's possible that Bek caught the spelling error and corrected it in the later messages. I was assuming she'd cut-and-pasted all of the messages, and they'd all read the same.
Whether you quoted the rule book or not, has nothing to do with whether or not you abused a loophole in a friendly game because you don't want to lose.
What, exactly, do you have against the Townspeople winning?
Well, I'm a little confused by this. I don't know if you're wrong about her sending them out en masse, or why she would have sent mine separately, but townsperson was spelled correctly in mine.
Did you receive the message earlier or later than I received it? It's possible that Bek caught the spelling error and corrected it in the later messages. I was assuming she'd cut-and-pasted all of the messages, and they'd all read the same.
Whether you quoted the rule book or not, has nothing to do with whether or not you abused a loophole in a friendly game because you don't want to lose.
What, exactly, do you have against the Townspeople winning?
Nothing. I still think you're guilty. And your sheer desparation to prove your innocence isn't helping.
Damn... that means Bek sent out our messages in a time window of at least two hours?
I try to send them out at the same time when I ref. That's how I discovered the limit on messages sent in a certain period of time last game I reffed. I had 13 tabs open on my browser with everyone's message ready to go, and after sending out a few I started to get messages telling me I'd exceeded the limit.
I guess I was wrong in assuming Bek sent the messages all in one sitting.
What, exactly, do you have against the Townspeople winning?
Nothing. I still think you're guilty. And your sheer desparation to prove your innocence isn't helping.
I'm trying to prove my innocence, true. I did so more to lend credibility to what I've been saying than to keep myself alive. I'm surprised I've lived this long; I said early on I didn't expect to live very long.
But I'd rather die at the hands of the Mafia than my fellow Townspeople. I promise you, you'll be wasting your votes down the line if you're basing them on my being Mafia.
Post by NothingButFlowers on Mar 20, 2009 14:27:31 GMT -5
I feel stupid bothering to say this at this point, and it doesn't seem like it's going to make any difference, but: I don't know if Kdogg is mafia or not. I don't know if fishingmaniac is mafia or not. I suspect fishingmaniac more than kdogg, but, as far as I can tell, everyone is suspect. I do know that I am innocent. I guess if fishingmaniac really is innocent, it doesn't matter which one of us you vote off, but I think you are making a big mistake by voting me off.
HGH and Kdogg also posted yesterday at 3 something within 3 minutes of each other, then they didn't write the rest of the night. It is unlike them not too write, I think they were scouting their target.
It is all so obvious.
I started work at 3pm yesterday (and will today as well). Inforoo time is one hour behind my Central time. You're trying to say I made a post on Inforoo at 3pm Info time/4pm my time - when I was internetless at work?
profile>>>>modify profile>>>dates and times>>>time zone>>>>GMT-6-central
wow kdogg, I'm really surprised that such a seasoned forum member didn't know that, right sadie?
Yeah, and we thought the last plus-sized game was going to be good.
I'm off to work. I'm leaving my vote open to give more people time to process this.
In the meantime, I want to suggest something else that's unprecedented: can we vote to undo a run-off?
This appears to be the only rule of voting.
3) Each day a vote is held for the player to be eliminated. For online play, deliberation and voting is combined; thus, you can vote and explain yourself in the same post. Every player is free to change their vote at any point up until the last vote is in and the Ref declares that voting is closed. The ref will then post the final tally, and announce which player is eliminated and how they died. Then will begin the following night.
I don't think anyone will be surprised to learn that I would be fine with voting to undo the runoff.
I'm thouroughly convinced that KDogg is innocent based on that post. I rescind my accusations and apologize.
wait, why the sudden change of heart?!
It appears they both claim to have had the same typo in their "you're a townsperson" PM. I'm not sure what it means because there was not a typo in mine, but mine also was sent at a different time, so take it for whatever you think it's worth.
Post by handgunhipster on Mar 20, 2009 15:19:45 GMT -5
I go take an exam and come back to this.
Wow. Too much to handle. Kelaroo- your reasoning that Kdogg and I post around the same time, is crazy. You and I were posting together today-- does that mean anything?
I know[correction, I'm almost positive] Kdogg and NBF and Fishing are all innocent.
I am not sure this should be used as a valid piece of evidence towards anyone, as it is supposed to be private and, basically, is being used in an act of desperation.. but my PM had no errors in it whatsoever.
Post by Fishing Maniac on Mar 20, 2009 17:50:52 GMT -5
Something isn't right. I want to ask if we get a tally on the time that everyone received their PMs, but that would out any special role people who received their PMs individually.
What I don't like about this is that it just seems too easy. Everything is working out too simple. Oh well. Trade show is ending. I'm going out to party. I'll check back in later.
