Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
I didn't like the idea of having a run-off with LD and me in it. I have no reason to believe he's mafia bc I don't know how he plays. Since I made that post tho, LD switched off of Potent lol.
LD switched off Potent before you made your post, but I'm going to assume you meant that LD switched off Potent while you were still making it. Regardless - why did you intend to stack Potent up to three?
This is correct. I was reading through the thread while he made the post and I didn't refresh.
I would have rather had one person who I think could be Mafia in the "lead" than 4 people in the run-off that contains one person I know isn't mafia and one person who I don't think is. It was basically a coin-flip between Potent and Mad Dog at the time. I could also switch to Theo now.
Also Jake JortlesDad Dog do we want to start the next phase of D1, or is anyone else open to switching the runoff a bit?
Btw I do think we should move ahead to 3 if we have enough participation between now and deadline.
There will be no support for this, but I’ve been thinking it could be smart to get all the newest players in the runoff with the idea that we may be able to get a read on one or two of them (mafia or town) once pressure is applied.
Also want to note that I found Rooloo’s “im gonna be busy with an exclamation point” post to be very unnecessary at this point. Rooloo rubbing me the wrong way may just be leaking in from last game though.
Also Jake JortlesDad Dog do we want to start the next phase of D1, or is anyone else open to switching the runoff a bit?
Btw I do think we should move ahead to 3 if we have enough participation between now and deadline.
There will be no support for this, but I’ve been thinking it could be smart to get all the newest players in the runoff with the idea that we may be able to get a read on one or two of them (mafia or town) once pressure is applied.
Also want to note that I found Rooloo’s “im gonna be busy with an exclamation point” post to be very unnecessary at this point. Rooloo rubbing me the wrong way may just be leaking in from last game though.
We have near 9 hours before the deadline and I suppose it's better than outright guessing but wouldn't the reads you get on us be the most inaccurate because you have almost no precedent?
Also Jake JortlesDad Dog do we want to start the next phase of D1, or is anyone else open to switching the runoff a bit?
Btw I do think we should move ahead to 3 if we have enough participation between now and deadline.
There will be no support for this, but I’ve been thinking it could be smart to get all the newest players in the runoff with the idea that we may be able to get a read on one or two of them (mafia or town) once pressure is applied.
Also want to note that I found Rooloo’s “im gonna be busy with an exclamation point” post to be very unnecessary at this point. Rooloo rubbing me the wrong way may just be leaking in from last game though.
He also hasn't received a vote yet (along with myself and Rummy). I don't necessarily think his statement is suspicious, but I don't think it'd be terrible to bring someone who hasn't received votes yet forward either.
5.5/four tet, daphni b2b floating points, avalon emerson 5.12/neil young 5.19/mannequin pussy 5.21/serpentwithfeet 5.25/hozier 6.12-16/bonnaroo 6.28/goose 6.29/goose 9.17/the national + the war on drugs 9.23/sigur ros 9.27-29/making time 10.17/air
Btw I do think we should move ahead to 3 if we have enough participation between now and deadline.
There will be no support for this, but I’ve been thinking it could be smart to get all the newest players in the runoff with the idea that we may be able to get a read on one or two of them (mafia or town) once pressure is applied.
Also want to note that I found Rooloo’s “im gonna be busy with an exclamation point” post to be very unnecessary at this point. Rooloo rubbing me the wrong way may just be leaking in from last game though.
We have near 9 hours before the deadline and I suppose it's better than outright guessing but wouldn't the reads you get on us be the most inaccurate because you have almost no precedent?
It would be the four people that have the worst understanding of how the Inforoo crowd expects you to play on Day 1, and I would hope to see more new or unique behavior.
Your point is valid, though.
The counter point that we've always used is that being lynched on day 1 sucks, and we don't want to scare away new players by lynching them and having them not sign up for future games.
You were one of the last 4 voters and chose not to stack
And re: T?
Went back to check and see what you might've been referring to -- all I really see is that King T moved off him, and Jortles isn't in our run off now in effect.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
You were one of the last 4 voters and chose not to stack
You love these little voting stats don't ya? So that caused you to say "I really don't think Jortles should slip out?" Noted. Seemed like there might be more beyond the pure bullshit stats that get argued about on every day 1 and never work to help town win.
You were one of the last 4 voters and chose not to stack
You love these little voting stats don't ya? So that caused you to say "I really don't think Jortles should slip out?" Noted. Seemed like there might be more beyond the pure bullshit stats that get argued about on every day 1 and never work to help town win.
fwiw last game 2/4 of last voters and 1/4 of those without votes were mafia. I'm kind of surprised no one brought that up regarding me late.
We have near 9 hours before the deadline and I suppose it's better than outright guessing but wouldn't the reads you get on us be the most inaccurate because you have almost no precedent?
It would be the four people that have the worst understanding of how the Inforoo crowd expects you to play on Day 1, and I would hope to see more new or unique behavior.
Your point is valid, though.
The counter point that we've always used is that being lynched on day 1 sucks, and we don't want to scare away new players by lynching them and having them not sign up for future games.
This is true, but it's nobody's first game, and somebody has to be the D1 lynch. I think your idea to put the four "newest" members in the runoff is a fine idea. Would that be Teddy/rooloo/Theo/King T?
You were one of the last 4 voters and chose not to stack
You love these little voting stats don't ya? So that caused you to say "I really don't think Jortles should slip out?" Noted. Seemed like there might be more beyond the pure bullshit stats that get argued about on every day 1 and never work to help town win.
I mean the last couple games I've been mafia, there was 2 mafia in those categories.
You were one of the last 4 voters and chose not to stack
And re: T?
Went back to check and see what you might've been referring to -- all I really see is that King T moved off him, and Jortles isn't in our run off now in effect.
Went back to check and see what you might've been referring to -- all I really see is that King T moved off him, and Jortles isn't in our run off now in effect.
Considering you've found the need to respond to my threads as if you are threatened by me I offer you some peace my confused counterpart. May you find peace in your restless soul.
It would be the four people that have the worst understanding of how the Inforoo crowd expects you to play on Day 1, and I would hope to see more new or unique behavior.
Your point is valid, though.
The counter point that we've always used is that being lynched on day 1 sucks, and we don't want to scare away new players by lynching them and having them not sign up for future games.
This is true, but it's nobody's first game, and somebody has to be the D1 lynch. I think your idea to put the four "newest" members in the runoff is a fine idea. Would that be Teddy/rooloo/Theo/King T?
Yeah those were the four I was thinking of. However, Tranter just said Rooloo isn't mafia, so that case is closed.
You were one of the last 4 voters and chose not to stack
You love these little voting stats don't ya? So that caused you to say "I really don't think Jortles should slip out?" Noted. Seemed like there might be more beyond the pure bullshit stats that get argued about on every day 1 and never work to help town win.
Also not to mention that we've literally never even tried to use these stats before even once. I have no idea how you could argue "it's bullshit that's never helped town" when we've literally never tried LMAO
You love these little voting stats don't ya? So that caused you to say "I really don't think Jortles should slip out?" Noted. Seemed like there might be more beyond the pure bullshit stats that get argued about on every day 1 and never work to help town win.
Also not to mention that we've literally never even tried to use these stats before even once. I have no idea how you could argue "it's bullshit that's never helped town" when we've literally never tried LMAO
Do you mean we collectively haven't tried? I try to use these every game.
Also not to mention that we've literally never even tried to use these stats before even once. I have no idea how you could argue "it's bullshit that's never helped town" when we've literally never tried LMAO
Do you mean we collectively haven't tried? I try to use these every game.
Yeah collectively. I think sometimes we've probably agreed to get one person with no votes in but it isn't a strategy that we as a whole have tried to go on.
You love these little voting stats don't ya? So that caused you to say "I really don't think Jortles should slip out?" Noted. Seemed like there might be more beyond the pure bullshit stats that get argued about on every day 1 and never work to help town win.
Also not to mention that we've literally never even tried to use these stats before even once. I have no idea how you could argue "it's bullshit that's never helped town" when we've literally never tried LMAO
Huh? Two games ago we collectively moved to get two people without votes in the runoff (Dan/JTR). They turned out to be our Inspector and Doctor sooo that didn't quite pan out but your statement is demonstrably false.
5.5/four tet, daphni b2b floating points, avalon emerson 5.12/neil young 5.19/mannequin pussy 5.21/serpentwithfeet 5.25/hozier 6.12-16/bonnaroo 6.28/goose 6.29/goose 9.17/the national + the war on drugs 9.23/sigur ros 9.27-29/making time 10.17/air
