Whether it's your first Bonnaroo or you’re a music festival veteran, we welcome you to Inforoo.
Here you'll find info about artists, rumors, camping tips, and the infamous Roo Clues. Have a look around then create an account and join in the fun. See you at Bonnaroo!!
Yes, but your reasoning behind that was "Arizona beat them in Seattle last year so it will happen again." When it was explained to you that one has nothing to do with the other you struggled mightly to comprehend the lack of a causal connection.
I still think San Fran winds up winning that division. I just have this ugly suspicion that the goddamned 49ers are going to pull it off.
Jesus, it's like you don't understand anything. I said Arizona beating them last year makes it possible for them to win since Seattle isn't invincible at home.
Yes, but your reasoning behind that was "Arizona beat them in Seattle last year so it will happen again." When it was explained to you that one has nothing to do with the other you struggled mightly to comprehend the lack of a causal connection.
I still think San Fran winds up winning that division. I just have this ugly suspicion that the goddamned 49ers are going to pull it off.
Jesus, it's like you don't understand anything. I said Arizona beating them last year makes it possible for them to win since Seattle isn't invincible at home.
I think it could be too late for San Fran though.
Arizona beating a team in 2013 has absolute zero to do with whether or not they can or will beat that team in 2014. There's absolutely zero causal connection between the two events. This is what you completely fail to grasp. Past success or failure isn't indicative at all of future performance, especially with something like wins/losses. Again, unless you think that Seattle was protected by some sort of magical invicibility force field which made them invulnerable at home, and that Arizona shut down the force field with last year's win, there's no connection.
At this point I just want the Giants to continue losing so we can completely clean house. Fire Coughlin. Fire Reese. Force Eli to take a drastic pay cut or release him. Draft a future leader early in the draft.
It's time to move on from an era that has already passed us by.
At this point I just want the Giants to continue losing so we can completely clean house. Fire Coughlin. Fire Reese. Force Eli to take a drastic pay cut or release him. Draft a future leader early in the draft.
It's time to move on from an era that has already passed us by.
At this point I just want the Giants to continue losing so we can completely clean house. Fire Coughlin. Fire Reese. Force Eli to take a drastic pay cut or release him. Draft a future leader early in the draft.
It's time to move on from an era that has already passed us by.
Jesus, it's like you don't understand anything. I said Arizona beating them last year makes it possible for them to win since Seattle isn't invincible at home.
I think it could be too late for San Fran though.
Arizona beating a team in 2013 has absolute zero to do with whether or not they can or will beat that team in 2014. There's absolutely zero causal connection between the two events. This is what you completely fail to grasp. Past success or failure isn't indicative at all of future performance, especially with something like wins/losses. Again, unless you think that Seattle was protected by some sort of magical invicibility force field which made them invulnerable at home, and that Arizona shut down the force field with last year's win, there's no connection.
Are you even reading my posts or do you like to pretend I say different things and just shitpost from there?
At this point I just want the Giants to continue losing so we can completely clean house. Fire Coughlin. Fire Reese. Force Eli to take a drastic pay cut or release him. Draft a future leader early in the draft.
It's time to move on from an era that has already passed us by.
Did Eli lose his #1 fan?
Nah, I'd still take him as my QB. I think he's capable of being a good game manager-type if he's not put in a position where he needs to force plays in order to stay in a game. That's what he was when the Giants won both Super Bowls and he's never been any more than that.
Given that, he just can't be getting paid $20 million per year. That money needs to be spent on the defense and offensive lines. That's how they got to those Super Bowls in the first place. (Strahan, Osi, Tuck, Cofield, Robbins, Joseph, Kiwanuka, Snee, O'Hara, Diehl, McKenzie).
Arizona beating a team in 2013 has absolute zero to do with whether or not they can or will beat that team in 2014. There's absolutely zero causal connection between the two events. This is what you completely fail to grasp. Past success or failure isn't indicative at all of future performance, especially with something like wins/losses. Again, unless you think that Seattle was protected by some sort of magical invicibility force field which made them invulnerable at home, and that Arizona shut down the force field with last year's win, there's no connection.
Are you even reading my posts or do you like to pretend I say different things and just shitpost from there?
Explain how I'm misreading what you're saying. You seem to believe that Arizona beating Seattle in 2013 "makes it possible for them to win since Seattle isn't invincible at home." Right? So now tell me, what about that Arizona victory enacted a fundamental change in whether or not Seattle can be beaten at home? Explain your logic. Show me the causality.
Are you even reading my posts or do you like to pretend I say different things and just shitpost from there?
Explain how I'm misreading what you're saying. You seem to believe that Arizona beating Seattle in 2013 "makes it possible for them to win since Seattle isn't invincible at home." Right? So now tell me, what about that Arizona victory enacted a fundamental change in whether or not Seattle can be beaten at home? Explain your logic. Show me the causality.
Because Arizona hasn't had a great passing game since Warner or a run game for....ever. So the one constant over the last few years has been defense (which did as much as they possibly could) and that was how they won last year and it was pretty much 99% of te reason they won last year except they had at least a little help from the offense last year but that was with Palmer and Fitz
Again, explaining the tactics Arizona used which helped them win has nothing to do with your apparent belief that a victory in 2013 has a connection to a win in 2014. Maybe spend a little less time posting on Inforoo and spend a little more paying attention to Sophomore year.
Again, explaining the tactics Arizona used which helped them win has nothing to do with your apparent belief that a victory in 2013 has a connection to a win in 2014. Maybe spend a little less time posting on Inforoo and spend a little more paying attention to Sophomore year.
"you're not showing any connection" -shows connection- "That's not a connection why aren't you showing a connection?"
You're just too young to grasp how stylin' I really was. All the boys wanted to do me when I was 5. Actually the girls did too. My haircut was confusing.
Post by TRANTER INDUSTRIES on Dec 8, 2014 16:00:32 GMT -5
Feels good to post a Kanye gif again. San Fran looks very beatable and I can't imagine anyone has any heart left on that team. Seattle is gonna be really close IMO because Arizona has a pretty underrated crowd, and St Louis will probably be a loss.
I am perfectly fine with 12-4, so hopefully they beat either St Louis or Seattle
Feels good to post a Kanye gif again. San Fran looks very beatable and I can't imagine anyone has any heart left on that team. Seattle is gonna be really close IMO because Arizona has a pretty underrated crowd, and St Louis will probably be a loss.
I am perfectly fine with 12-4, so hopefully they beat either St Louis or Seattle
But Seattle beat Arizona in Arizona last year so it'll happen again.
Feels good to post a Kanye gif again. San Fran looks very beatable and I can't imagine anyone has any heart left on that team. Seattle is gonna be really close IMO because Arizona has a pretty underrated crowd, and St Louis will probably be a loss.
I am perfectly fine with 12-4, so hopefully they beat either St Louis or Seattle
But Seattle beat Arizona in Arizona last year so it'll happen again.
If he IS hurt and is still doing this good, then he must be one of the best backs in TV league, right?
He looks much better than last year and he wasn't hurt then. It's gonna take a lot to knock him out.
Ever heard of Ahmad Bradshaw? He always played through pain at a very high level. And eventually he can't go anymore and ends the season early.
I'm not downplaying Ellington. Just like Bradshaw a big reason he's great is because he can play through injuries at a high level. But I wouldn't get your hopes up on him being the next AP or Marshawn Lynch in terms of durability.