"like"

[.]

The progressions of this thread will spin your head.

[Funky Munky]

If you make it to the Dirty you are a pretty lame summers breeze.

[pmo]

Has Sproat ever showed up at the brunch? Obviously Lono met him, is that where?

[.]

I still don't understand how Lono recognized him just because he was screaming at Krishnas.

[Dave Maynar]

Mar 7, 2012 11:43:35 GMT -5 JHOinTN said:

Haha, I guess I deserve that. Honestly though I would rather have people not like me than deal with weird/creepy/crazy folks.

Just to double-check. It was all a joke. I wasn't calling you any of those things.

[itrainmonkeys]

Mar 7, 2012 13:03:06 GMT -5 . said:

I still don't understand how Lono recognized him just because he was screaming at Krishnas.

I don't understand 90% of what Lono says.

Is emoney unbanned? I can click on his name and view his profile.

[roofanintn]

Mar 7, 2012 13:13:12 GMT -5 @jeffp1717 said:

Is emoney unbanned?

Nope

Bummer.

and after we all bonded over how crazy sproat is

#freeemoney

[holls]

Wow...I remember when LoveLuckLaughter sent me a FB Friend Suggestion for him. I had no clue who he was. I'm still FB friends w/him, but I hid his posts from my feed eons ago. I got tired of the Guido ego pics.

[mc]

Wowwwwwwwwwww.

Mind is blown.

[Alberto Balsalm]

Mar 7, 2012 11:19:47 GMT -5 @flanzonyc said:

Oh, hey, lookie here.

thedirty.com/2011/08/the-online-loser/

couldn't hold it in any longer?

[abrakapokus]

So it's been a couple days, is Emoney getting unbanned or what?

Mar 7, 2012 13:51:39 GMT -5 Alberto Balsalm said:

Mar 7, 2012 11:19:47 GMT -5 @flanzonyc said:

Oh, hey, lookie here.

thedirty.com/2011/08/the-online-loser/

couldn't hold it in any longer?

I mean, if we were discussing John Lennon, I might have linked to one of the many books written about his life.

But since we're talking about Sproat, I linked to that, which is basically a mini-biography.

[roofanintn]

Mar 7, 2012 13:57:36 GMT -5 abrakapokus said:

So it's been a couple days, is Emoney getting unbanned or what?

Mar 7, 2012 13:18:57 GMT -5 roofanintn said:

Mar 7, 2012 13:13:12 GMT -5 @jeffp1717 said:

Is emoney unbanned?

Nope

Did more people complain about emoney than are pleading for him to be unbanned in this thread?

[Phi]

i think most of us people who would prefer to see emoney stay banned (like myself) are just keeping quiet so we dont get lynch mobbed and have to argue with everyone back n forth. we have nothing to protest, we got what we wanted.

[Airline]

bring him back or the skrillex thread gets a whole lot worse....that is a threat.

[Phi]

good luck. i had that thread locked up a long time ago. you can however troll the skrillex thread devoted to trashing skrillex all you want

Mar 7, 2012 14:59:51 GMT -5 Phi said:

i think most of us people who would prefer to see emoney stay banned (like myself) are just keeping quiet so we dont get lynch mobbed and have to argue with everyone back n forth. we have nothing to protest, we got what we wanted.

You mean, besides the back-and-forth that already took place? Also, it's appreciated that you portray the people who want emoney back as some crazed, mindless mob.

I think we were pretty well-spoken in our belief that this was an unfair banning. We gave reasons and we supported those reasons. We didn't just come in here and all-caps a "BRING BACK EMONEY OR ELSE!!!" type of response.

I am willing to bet the posts in support of emoney in this thread were much more eloquent than the complaints that got him banned.

Mar 7, 2012 14:59:51 GMT -5 Phi said:

i think most of us people who would prefer to see emoney stay banned (like myself) are just keeping quiet so we dont get lynch mobbed and have to argue with everyone back n forth. we have nothing to protest, we got what we wanted.

Right. I was just curious as to whether the initial complaints outnumbered the pleas for his return. Not that it matters, just wondering out of geniune curiosity. Obviously now that you "got what you wanted", you have nothing to argue about.

[Phi]

Mar 7, 2012 15:08:29 GMT -5 @flanzonyc said:

Mar 7, 2012 14:59:51 GMT -5 Phi said:

i think most of us people who would prefer to see emoney stay banned (like myself) are just keeping quiet so we dont get lynch mobbed and have to argue with everyone back n forth. we have nothing to protest, we got what we wanted.

You mean, besides the back-and-forth that already took place? Also, it's appreciated that you portray the people who want emoney back as some crazed, mindless mob.

I think we were pretty well-spoken in our belief that this was an unfair banning. We gave reasons and we supported those reasons. We didn't just come in here and all-caps a "BRING BACK EMONEY OR ELSE!!!" type of response.

I am willing to bet the posts in support of emoney in this thread were much more eloquent than the complaints that got him banned.

looooool

wtf?

you got all that from me saying "lynch mobbed"?

i said NONE of what you just said.

[Dave Maynar]

Mar 7, 2012 15:53:23 GMT -5 Phi said:

looooool

wtf?

you got all that from me saying "lynch mobbed"?

i said NONE of what you just said.

You're from the South, Phil. You should know that the term "lynch mob" solicits a pretty serious reaction.

P.S. No sarcasm in that post.

[Phi]

i would define "lynch mob" as a group of upset and angry people?

if you're trying to say it was meant to be racist or something, it wasnt?

[mc]

You do realize that "lynch mob" has a connotation to it inferring irrationality, correct? Sorry for arguing, but you did kind of infer that we were unruly and mindless.

Also, I really don't understand why you would rather him be banned. Theres an ignore function, why can you not use it on him? I have several members on this forum on ignore and it doesn't hinder my experience at all...

[Dave Maynar]

Mar 7, 2012 15:58:20 GMT -5 Phi said:

i would define "lynch mob" as a group of upset and angry people?

if you're trying to say it was meant to be racist or something, it wasnt?

No, I'm not calling you racist at all. I do associate the term with the Civil Rights movement, and many of those lynch mobs ended in people getting killed for what a vast majority of people in the country today would call crazy beliefs.

[Phi]

like i said, in my head i defined "lynch mob" as a group of angry and upset people. i had no idea it meant "irrational or dumb" or anything.

sincerely apologize if you guys took it that way.

and if i had to chose between having emoney around, and not, i would chose not. the guy constantly troleld me. but i completely understand why some of you are defending him. im not saying its unjust.

[mc]

I mean it does have a racist connotation with it too but its quite obvious he meant it with no racial intentions. But it still does infer when calling a group a "lynch mob" in a non-literal sense, you are inferring that they are passionate, reactionary, and irrational.

Mar 7, 2012 15:53:23 GMT -5 Phi said:

looooool

wtf?

you got all that from me saying "lynch mobbed"?

i said NONE of what you just said.

I guess you are unaware of the connotations that are associated with the term "lynch mob."

You basically said if someone speaks their mind in support of the ban, they'd be attacked. I was disagreeing with that sentiment, as many people had spoken in support of it without being attacked.